Search titles only.
Outsider Senior Member Portuguese Portugal. Petter Member Oslo. Norwegian: Ingenting varer evig! But Victor— now a professor at York University in Toronto—felt something tugging him in the opposite direction. Ecologists were beginning to learn that Earth does have limits. Pump enough pollution into a lake and you can ruin it forever; chop down enough forest and it might never grow back. I think we live in very abnormal times.
In essence, endless growth puts us on the horns of a seemingly intractable dilemma. Without it, we spiral into poverty. With it, we deplete the planet. Either way, we lose. Could we stave off ecological collapse by reining in the world economy? Could we do it without starving?
Victor wanted to find out. First, he created a computer model replicating the modern Canadian economy.
Nothing is Forever – The History of 2/3 Commandos
Then he tweaked it so that crucial elements—including consumption, productivity, and population—gradually stopped growing after To stave off unemployment, he shortened the workweek to roughly four days, creating more jobs. He also set up higher taxes on the rich and more public services for the poor, and imposed a carbon tax to fill government coffers and discourage the use of fossil fuels.
The upshot? Stiglitz to draft new ways to measure prosperity without relying on GDP as the main indicator. But what would a no-growth society look like? Would we like it?
And could we build one? Even Adam Smith, the great-great-grandfather of capitalism, acknowledged that it might be possible for an economy to max out its natural resources and stop growing. In the 19th century, economist-philosopher John Stuart Mill argued that growth was necessary only up to the point where everyone enjoyed a reasonable standard of living.
Yet no-growth theory never took off. Politicians came to see growth as a hedge against deficit spending and high unemployment —that political third rail—and economists figured that extended periods of growth were needed to lift people out of poverty. So Western governments fine-tuned their policies—imposing lower taxes on capital gains than on labor, for example—to promote growth by rewarding investment. The obsession with growth was also a practical matter, since it seemed like the most reliable way to gauge the prosperity of a country.
Instead, they looked to GDP as the primary benchmark for whether things are getting better or worse. During the formative years of industrial-age economics, after all, resources did seem limitless.
Early California residents recalled salmon so bountiful that you could practically cross streams on the backs of the fish. Beginning around , Thomas Robert Malthus famously predicted that population was growing faster than the earth could support. But his predictions of widespread global famine never came to pass, because technological improvements in agriculture made land far more productive than Malthus ever dreamed. He also failed to predict that rising prosperity would put the brakes on birth rates. By the 20th century, growth had become not only an item of faith in economics, but a deeply held political belief.
When Franklin Roosevelt supported grappling with Great Depression unemployment by decreasing the workweek to 30 hours, the largest corporations fought back fiercely.
Will Clarke - Nothing Is Forever on Traxsource
Roosevelt backed down. Roughly The production of laboratory-grown diamonds for jewellery purposes is only a fraction of the total laboratory-grown diamond production between 2. The laboratory-grown diamond production for jewellery purposes is set to increase as technology improves the quality of the laboratory-grown diamonds as well as the size. For laboratory-grown diamond producers the profit earned on gem quality laboratory-grown diamonds is more attractive than on industrial laboratory-grown diamonds. Therefore, it is likely that these producers will focus more on gem-quality laboratory-grown diamonds.
Currently gem-quality laboratory-grown diamonds are 0.
nothing is forever
Such an increase in production will probably result in downward pressure on prices of laboratory-grown diamonds. In short, taking into account how quickly technology changes, probably sooner rather than later laboratory-grown gem-quality diamonds production will exceed mined gem-quality diamond production.
This would be a revolution and fundamentally challenge the mined-diamond sector. Last but not least, the natural diamond marketing magic has lost its sparkle and the laboratory-grown diamond producers have used this to their advance. The laboratory-grown diamond producers have done a strong marketing campaign that laboratory-grown diamonds are more sustainable.
On the next page we will come back to this as we hired an independent company True Price to investigate, among other things, this assumption. Laboratory-grown diamond producers have been able to connect with the millennials by promoting themselves as high tech, innovative and clean. These are issues that are highly valued by millennials.
The natural diamond producers are facing a challenge to improve the sentiment towards mined diamonds and to connect with the millennials. We have hired an external company True Price see box1 above to investigate the sustainability aspect of laboratory-grown diamonds, large-scale mined diamonds and artisanal-mined diamonds so that diamonds from these different sources can be compared.
This does not only take into account what the end consumer pays for the product the retail price but also various environmental and social costs. These are not part of the price tag, but are paid nonetheless — for instance by local communities air and water pollution , by future generations climate change or by employees in the value chain health and safety risks.
Listen to Nothing Is Forever now.
These costs on top of the retail price are together referred to as the true price gap. The true price results should be seen as a starting point to have a dialogue with the Diamond Industry. They are not the final conclusion and there is some uncertainty around the numbers. The methodology of True Price requires them to make some assumptions. The quantification is therefore inevitably surrounded by a margin of error for the full report click here. The results show that the true price gap for an artisanally mined 1 carat polished diamond is the highest while the true-price gap of laboratory-grown diamonds is the lowest.
In the case of artisanally mined diamonds this enormous gap is mainly the result of social factors such as unsafe working conditions and low pay but also low labour productivity. Progress has been made to improve the social conditions of artisanal miners. However, artisanally mined diamonds are only a small share of the total market.